<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defend Higher Education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk</link>
	<description>We call for a national agreement to protect jobs in higher education, and we call on university employers to mandate the UCEA to seek an agreement with the unions in the interests of our economy and our communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:35:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Last scheduled negotiations sees no movement on key issues</title>
		<link>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=88</link>
		<comments>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=88#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>campaign coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[JNCHES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redundancy agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[external examiners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender pay gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hourly pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay offer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay spine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At the final meeting of the union/employer national negotiating forum, held on 28 July, the university employers&#8217; association, UCEA, continued to refuse national level talks to develop jointly-agreed proposals to improve job security. With fears that over 22,000 jobs are at risk, this refusal is unacceptable and irresponsible.</p>
<p>The employers’ final offer to the joint unions was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the final meeting of the union/employer national negotiating forum, held on 28 July, the university employers&#8217; association, UCEA, continued to refuse national level talks to develop jointly-agreed proposals to improve job security. With fears that over 22,000 jobs are at risk, this refusal is unacceptable and irresponsible.</p>
<p>The employers’ final offer to the joint unions was for an increase on pay points of 0.4%. With RPI running at 5.0%, the employers’ offer represents a real-terms pay cut for the second year running. The five trade unions accused the HE employers of refusing to engage in meaningful national negotiations in response to the first ever joint union claim. It should be noted that the offer also failed even to address many other aspects of the claim, including measures to improve equality in the sector. For example, the employers failed to make an offer in response to the modest claims from the trade union to:</p>
<ul>
<li>remove the bottom two pay points of the national pay spine and its extension at the top to create additional points beyond point 51</li>
<li>assimilate hourly-paid staff to the national pay spine</li>
<li>produce joint proposals to close the gender pay gap</li>
<li>develop a national system for the remuneration of external examiners.</li>
</ul>
<p>The individual unions are now consulting with members on where we go next, but UCU has stated that in the absence of a more credible offer they will be balloting for industrial action in September.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=88</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No progress in national talks between unions and university employers</title>
		<link>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=86</link>
		<comments>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=86#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>campaign coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[JNCHES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redundancy agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[training & development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The higher education unions &#8211; the University and College Union (UCU), EIS, GMB, UNISON and Unite &#8211; today (Monday) issued the following joint statement:</p>
<p>&#8216;At the new JNCHES meeting held on Monday 19 April, UCEA failed to improve on their previous offer of a sum equivalent to 0.25% (non-consolidated). They also failed to respond to other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The higher education unions &#8211; the University and College Union (UCU), EIS, GMB, UNISON and Unite &#8211; today (Monday) issued the following joint statement:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8216;At the new JNCHES meeting held on Monday 19 April, UCEA failed to improve on their previous offer of a sum equivalent to 0.25% (non-consolidated). They also failed to respond to other aspects on the trade unions’ claim, including the need for proposals to improve job security in the sector. They did, however, indicate a willingness to discuss issues associated with training and development further. UCEA negotiators agreed to refer the current position back to their board meeting on 29 April. The parties agreed to meet again on 5 May. The trade union side hope that the employer will come to the table with a credible offer.&#8217;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=86</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New campaign materials</title>
		<link>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=76</link>
		<comments>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=76#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>campaign coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Redundancy agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaflet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[templates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve now produced a new set of Defend Higher Education materials in our campaign to get a national agreement with the employers that commits universities to defending jobs, protecting the value of our pay and providing greater security for the most vulnerable workers in our sector.</p>
<p>This includes :</p>
<p>Defend Higher Education poster</p>
<p>Defend Higher Education leaflet</p>
<p>Defend Higher Education petition</p>
<p>Defend Higher Education: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/dhe2010_poster.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-81" title="Defend Higher Education poster" src="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/dhe2010_poster.jpg" alt="Defend Higher Education poster" width="175" height="247" /></a>We&#8217;ve now produced a new set of Defend Higher Education materials in our campaign to get a national agreement with the employers that commits universities to defending jobs, protecting the value of our pay and providing greater security for the most vulnerable workers in our sector.</p>
<p>This includes :</p>
<p><a href="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/dhe2010_poster.pdf">Defend Higher Education poster</a></p>
<p><a href="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/dhe2010_leaflet.pdf">Defend Higher Education leaflet</a></p>
<p><a href="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/dhe2010_petition.pdf">Defend Higher Education petition</a></p>
<p><a href="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/dhe2010_template.doc">Defend Higher Education: local template</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=76</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report back from negotiating meeting</title>
		<link>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=69</link>
		<comments>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=69#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>campaign coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[JNCHES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At the new JNCHES meeting on 29 March, UCEA made an offer to explore how a non-consolidated cash sum equivalent to 0.25% of pay bill could be applied.</p>
<p>The employers made no serious attempt to address the other key elements of the joint union claim; for example, nothing on:</p>

job security
improving the national framework agreement and terms [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the new JNCHES meeting on 29 March, UCEA made an offer to explore how a non-consolidated cash sum equivalent to 0.25% of pay bill could be applied.</p>
<p>The employers made no serious attempt to address the other key elements of the joint union claim; for example, nothing on:</p>
<ul>
<li>job security</li>
<li>improving the national framework agreement and terms and conditions of employment</li>
<li>the assimilation of hourly-paid staff to the national agreement</li>
<li>proposals to close the gender pay gap</li>
<li>proposals for a national system to pay external examiners.</li>
</ul>
<p>Without producing any convincing evidence, the employers asserted that the effect of incremental increases on the pay bill should be taken into account during pay negotiations. This provoked a strong response from the trade unions. Unlike the private sector, who pay the rate for the job from day one, in the public sector staff start below the full rate and build up reflecting increasing knowledge and skills &#8211; arguably providing a short term subsidy for HE employers.</p>
<p>The employers negotiated a pay deal in 2003 that clearly accepted increments as part of the structure so to complain now, when they have known and presumably budgeted for such increases, is a little disingenuous.  They are looking for fig leaves and this will not wash.</p>
<p>The trade union side unanimously rejected the offer.  The employers were asked to rethink their position and come to the next meeting with a credible offer.</p>
<p>Another meeting is scheduled for 19 April.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=69</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National claim submitted</title>
		<link>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=64</link>
		<comments>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=64#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>campaign coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[JNCHES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redundancy agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[framework agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[external examiners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hourly pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london weighting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The five unions have submitted their joint national claim for 2010 to the University and College Employers&#8217; Association (UCEA). The next meeting of the Joint National Committee for Higher Education Staff (JNCHES) is Monday 29 March.</p>
<p>In brief the claim calls for: </p>

a catch-up for the real terms cut last year; a keep-up element for next; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The five unions have submitted their joint national claim for 2010 to the University and College Employers&#8217; Association (UCEA). The next meeting of the Joint National Committee for Higher Education Staff (JNCHES) is Monday 29 March.</p>
<p><strong>In brief the claim calls for: </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>a catch-up for the real terms cut last year; a keep-up element for next; a minimum rate; and a need to recognise the low paid</li>
<li>demand for a national negotiations over a national approach to  job security</li>
<li>an update the national agreement</li>
<li>work to address inequality, particularly HPLs and gender pay gap</li>
<li>talks on pay for external examiners</li>
<li>an increase in London Weighting and talks on other high cost areas.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?page_id=58">Read more detail here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=64</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Institutions face up to 12% cash cuts from Hefce</title>
		<link>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=52</link>
		<comments>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=52#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>campaign coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEFCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In 2010-11 only 25 (19% of) higher education institutions in England will receive a real terms funding rise (above the forecast level of inflation).</p>
<p>More than a quarter (37 institutions) will have a real terms cut (a cash increase below the level of inflation) and over half (69 institutions) face a cash cut.</p>
<p>The worst affected institutions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2010-11 only 25 (19% of) higher education institutions in England will receive a real terms funding rise (above the forecast level of inflation).</p>
<p><strong>More than a quarter</strong> (37 institutions) will have a <strong>real terms cut</strong> (a cash increase below the level of inflation) and over half (69 institutions) face a cash cut.</p>
<p>The worst affected institutions will get cash cuts of up to 12%, according to funding arrangements set out today by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2010/10_08/">Recurrent grants for 2010-11, Hefce</a></p>
<h3>Reactions:</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.unison.org.uk/asppresspack/pressrelease_view.asp?id=1793">UNISON calls for fair deal for HE staff as annual funding is announced</a></p>
<p class="articleheading"><a href="http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=4501&amp;from=1676">University funding cuts will lead to disappointment for students and drop in quality, warns UCU</a></p>
<h3 class="articleheading">Press:</h3>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/8573432.stm">Universities facing &#8216;first budget cuts in years, BBC </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/mar/18/university-budgets-slashed">University budgets to be slashed by up to 14%, Guardian</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&amp;storycode=410879&amp;c=2">Teaching and research escape 9% grant cut, Times Higher Education</a></p>
<p class="heading"><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/education/article7066517.ece">100 universities suffer as Government announces £450 million of cuts, Times</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=52</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HEFCE announces further HE cuts</title>
		<link>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=50</link>
		<comments>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=50#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>campaign coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEFCE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the latest &#8216;grant letter&#8217; from business secretary, Lord Mandelson, to the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) chairman, Tim Melville-Ross, the government said it was reducing HEFCE&#8217;s grant by 6.6%, including additional cuts of £135m to ones previously announced. For the first time in a decade the unit of public spending per student [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest &#8216;grant letter&#8217; from business secretary, Lord Mandelson, to the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) chairman, Tim Melville-Ross, the government said it was reducing HEFCE&#8217;s grant by 6.6%, including additional cuts of £135m to ones previously announced. For the first time in a decade the unit of public spending per student is being cut in real terms.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/hefce/2009/grant1011/" target="_blank">See more on the HEFCE website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=50</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What a waste&#8230;?</title>
		<link>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=18</link>
		<comments>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=18#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>campaign coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We want to hold our universities to account and we need as much local information as possible. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Please contact your branch officers if you hear about any job cuts or any expenditure projects you think are wasting university funds which could be better spent on protecting jobs and wages.</p>
<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">We want to hold our universities to account and we need as much local information as possible. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Please contact your branch officers if you hear about any job cuts or any expenditure projects you think are wasting university funds which could be better spent on protecting jobs and wages.</span></p>
<p><!--EndFragment--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=18</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spread the message</title>
		<link>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=21</link>
		<comments>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=21#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>campaign coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaflet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[templates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="wp-caption-text">the campaign poster</p>
<p>The first set of posters, leaflets and an off-line copy of the petition are now available for download below.</p>
<p>Please support the campaign by distributing these on your campus.</p>
<p>Campaign leaflet (.pdf)</p>
<p>Campaign poster &#8211; A4 (.pdf)</p>
<p>Campaign poster &#8211; A3 (.pdf)</p>
<p>The petition (.pdf)</p>
<p>Also here for download is a leaflet/letter template local branches can use to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_30" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 165px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-30   " style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;" title="the campaign poster" src="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/dhe_postera4_jul09.jpg" alt="the campaign poster" width="155" height="219" /><p class="wp-caption-text">the campaign poster</p></div>
<p>The first set of posters, leaflets and an off-line copy of the petition are now available for download below.</p>
<p>Please support the campaign by distributing these on your campus.</p>
<p><a href="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/dhe_flier_jul09.pdf">Campaign leaflet (.pdf)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/dhe_postera4_jul09.pdf">Campaign poster &#8211; A4 (.pdf)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/dhe_postera3_jul09.pdf">Campaign poster &#8211; A3 (.pdf)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/dhe_petition.pdf">The petition (.pdf)</a></p>
<p>Also here for download is a leaflet/letter template local branches can use to publicise local meetings:</p>
<p><a href="http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/dhe_localmeetingtemplate.doc">Local meeting template (.doc)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=21</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Higher education in crisis</title>
		<link>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=3</link>
		<comments>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=3#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>campaign coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph">

a wave of job cuts is already sweeping through our universities
99 universities have said they intend to cut jobs
employers are offering a pay increase of just 0.5% &#8211; undermining recent progress on pay.

<p class="MsoNormal">At a time of economic recession, education is more important than ever</p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph">

reject the short-termist slash and burn strategy
support the campaign [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph">
<ul>
<li><span lang="EN-US">a wave of job cuts is already sweeping through our universities</span></li>
<li><span lang="EN-US">99 universities have said they intend to cut jobs</span></li>
<li><span lang="EN-US">employers are offering a pay increase of just 0.5% &#8211; undermining recent progress on pay.</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span lang="EN-US">At a time of economic recession, education is more important than ever</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph">
<ul>
<li><span lang="EN-US">reject the short-termist slash and burn strategy</span></li>
<li><span lang="EN-US">support the campaign for a national agreement to protect jobs</span></li>
<li><span lang="EN-US">demand fair treatment and fair pay for all university staff.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><!--EndFragment--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defendhighereducation.org.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
